>

The U.S. Presidential Debate: A Gabfest That Disintegrated into a Gong Show

A Gong Show, Indeed

The debate was a chaotic mess, with both candidates frequently interrupting each other and talking over each other. The moderator was unable to control the candidates, and the debate quickly devolved into a shouting match. As a result, many viewers found the debate to be uninformative and frustrating.

A Gabfest, to be Sure

The candidates spent much of the debate talking about their personal experiences and attacking each other's character, rather than discussing the issues. They also made several false or misleading statements. As a result, many viewers felt that the debate was a waste of time.

What Went Wrong?

Several factors contributed to the failure of the debate. * First, the candidates were not prepared to engage in a substantive discussion of the issues. * Second, the moderator was unable to control the candidates or keep them on track. * Third, the debate format was not conducive to a productive discussion.

What Can Be Done?

There are several things that can be done to improve the quality of future presidential debates. * First, the candidates should be required to submit their talking points to the moderator in advance. * Second, the moderator should be given more authority to control the debate and keep the candidates on track. * Third, the debate format should be changed to allow for more substantive discussion of the issues. By making these changes, we can help ensure that future presidential debates are more informative and productive.

Conclusion

The U.S. presidential debate was a disappointment. The candidates were not prepared, the moderator was ineffective, and the debate format was not conducive to a productive discussion. As a result, many viewers found the debate to be uninformative and frustrating. In order to improve the quality of future presidential debates, several changes need to be made. These changes include requiring the candidates to submit their talking points in advance, giving the moderator more authority to control the debate, and changing the debate format to allow for more substantive discussion of the issues.