>

North Carolina, Whistleblowing, Native Americans in the United States, Associated Press

North Carolina Supreme Court Rules against Native American Whistleblower

Landmark Decision Weakens Protections for Those Reporting Wrongdoing

In a major setback for whistleblower protections, the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled against a Native American employee who was fired after reporting financial misconduct.

The case involved a former employee of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, who alleged that she was fired in retaliation for reporting financial irregularities to the tribe's chief.

The court ruled that the tribe was not subject to the state's whistleblower protection laws because it is a sovereign nation.

Implications of the Ruling

The ruling has far-reaching implications for Native American whistleblowers, who are now more vulnerable to retaliation.

It also sends a message to other employers that they may be able to avoid liability for retaliating against whistleblowers by claiming sovereign immunity.

Background of the Case

The plaintiff in the case, LeAnn Burch, was a financial analyst for the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians.

In 2015, she reported to the tribe's chief that she had found evidence of financial misconduct, including unauthorized spending and conflicts of interest.

After she made the report, Burch was subjected to a hostile work environment and was eventually fired.

Legal Arguments

Burch filed a lawsuit against the tribe, alleging that she was fired in retaliation for her whistleblower activity.

The tribe argued that it was not subject to the state's whistleblower protection laws because it is a sovereign nation.

The court agreed with the tribe's argument, ruling that the state's laws do not apply to Native American tribes.

Reaction to the Ruling

The ruling has been met with widespread criticism from whistleblower advocates.

They argue that the decision undermines the protection of whistleblowers and makes it more difficult to hold wrongdoers accountable.

The ruling is also a setback for Native American sovereignty, as it limits the ability of tribes to self-govern and protect their own members.

Conclusion

The North Carolina Supreme Court's ruling is a major blow to whistleblower protections.

It sends a message to employers that they may be able to avoid liability for retaliating against whistleblowers by claiming sovereign immunity.

The ruling also undermines Native American sovereignty and makes it more difficult for tribes to protect their own members.