>

«Гладиатора 2» упрекнули в исторической неверности

'Gladiator 2' accused of historical inaccuracy

New movie criticised for depicting Roman emperor Commodus as invincible

Critics say the film's portrayal of Commodus is at odds with historical accounts

The upcoming movie 'Gladiator 2' has been accused of historical inaccuracy, with critics pointing to its depiction of Roman emperor Commodus as an invincible warrior.

The film, which is a sequel to the 2000 blockbuster 'Gladiator', stars Joaquin Phoenix as Commodus, who is shown as a skilled fighter who easily defeats his opponents.

However, critics say that this portrayal is at odds with historical accounts, which suggest that Commodus was actually a skilled gladiator, but he was not invincible.

In fact, Commodus was eventually killed by a gladiator named Narcissus, who was able to exploit his weakness for showboating.

The film's director, Ridley Scott, has defended its portrayal of Commodus, saying that it is based on historical sources.

However, critics say that Scott has taken liberties with history in order to create a more exciting film.

What historians say about Commodus

Historians say that Commodus was a complex and controversial figure.

He was a skilled gladiator who won over 1,000 fights, but he was also a cruel and tyrannical ruler.

Commodus was eventually killed by a gladiator named Narcissus in 192 AD.

The film's historical inaccuracies

Critics say that 'Gladiator 2' contains a number of historical inaccuracies, including:

• The film depicts Commodus as an invincible warrior, when in reality he was killed by a gladiator named Narcissus.
• The film shows Commodus fighting in the Colosseum, when in reality he rarely fought in public.
• The film depicts Commodus as a cruel and tyrannical ruler, when in reality he was initially popular with the people.

Conclusion

The film 'Gladiator 2' has been accused of historical inaccuracy, with critics pointing to its depiction of Roman emperor Commodus as an invincible warrior.

Historians say that Commodus was a complex and controversial figure who was skilled gladiator but also a cruel and tyrannical ruler.

The film's director has defended its portrayal of Commodus, but critics say that he has taken liberties with history in order to create a more exciting film.